Marcel VOIA
VOIA
Marcel
enseignant-chercheurs
Domaine de recherche : Économie Internationale et Développement Durable
Bureau : A209
Encadrement doctoral
1. Saikou Amadou Diallo, 2020
2. Lucien Ahouangbe (co-supervision), 2020
3. Florina Burdet (co-supervision), 2021
4. Teodora Pop (co-supervision), 2021
5. Genevieve Vallee (co-supervision), 2022
6. Mathis Linger (co-supervision), 2022
7. Chantale Oweggi (co-supervision), 2022
8. MEDDEB Safa (co-supervision), 2022
9. Minyar KHAYAT (co-supervision), 2023
10. Molka Ben-Ayed (cotutelle), 2023
Travaux
- Publications dans des revues scientifiques
- Ouvrages et rapports
- Documents de travail et autres publications
- Communications
2024
Explaining bitcoin ownership in Canada: Trends from 2016 to 2021
Abstract This paper studies the dynamics of bitcoin ownership from 2016 to 2021, using the Bank of Canada's Bitcoin Omnibus Surveys. The estimated rate of bitcoin ownership jumped to 13% in 2021, up from the 5% observed in the previous three years. On one hand, this increase reflected broader economic trends related to increased savings and investment of Canadians during the COVID‐19 pandemic, along with financial technology companies providing accessible and user‐friendly platforms for buying bitcoin. Looking deeper, we use econometric models to quantify several specific ways in which bitcoin became more mainstream as an investment in 2021. Finally, we investigate the high cash holdings of bitcoin owners across time.
Lien HAL2022
Internal promotion and the Bosman ruling: Evidence from the English Premier League
Résumé non disponible.
Lien HALDoes more finance lead to longer crises?
Empirical studies emphasise that higher financial development (FD) amplifies the output cost of banking crises. However, no study has so far investigated the effect of FD on another key dimension of banking crises, namely their duration. Using a large sample of banking crises over the 1977-2014 period, we find that higher FD is associated with a significant increase in the duration of banking crises (DBC). This result is robust to a broad range of alternative specifications and is unaffected by unobserved heterogeneity or endogeneity. Finally, we show that the effect of FD on DBC is subject to nonlinearities and varies across decades and with the level of economic development.
Lien HAL2021
Does public debt secure social peace? A diversionary theory of public debt management
Résumé non disponible.
Lien HALDo the determinants of employment duration vary across employment spells?
Résumé non disponible.
Lien HALDynamic panels with MIDAS covariates: Nonlinearity, estimation and fit
Résumé non disponible.
Lien HAL2020
Immigrant earnings returns to post‐migration education: Evidence for Canada, 1999–2013
Résumé non disponible.
Lien HAL2019
Bootstrap bias correction for average treatment effects with inverse propensity weights
The estimated average treatment effect in observational studies is biased if the assumptions of ignorability and overlap are not satisfied. To deal with this potential problem when propensity score weights are used in the estimation of the treatment effects, in this paper we propose a bootstrap bias correction estimator for the average treatment effect (ATE) obtained with the inverse propensity score (BBC-IPS) estimator. We show in simulations that the BBC-IPC performs well when we have misspecifications of the propensity score (PS) due to: omitted variables (ignorability property may not be satisfied), overlap (imbalances in distribution between treatment and control groups) and confounding effects between observables and unobservables (endogeneity). Further refinements in bias reductions of the ATE estimates in smaller samples are attained by iterating the BBC-IPS estimator.
Lien HALNon-Standard Confidence Sets for Ratios and Tipping Points with Applications to Dynamic Panel Data
Résumé non disponible.
Lien HAL2018
Estimation of Health Care Demand and its Implication on Income Effects of Individuals
Abstract Zero inflation and over-dispersion issues can significantly affect the predicted probabilities as well as lead to unreliable estimations in count data models. This paper investigates whether considering this issue for German Socioeconomic Panel (1984–1995), used by Riphahn et al. (2003), provides any evidence of misspecification in their estimated models for adverse selection and moral hazard effects in health demand market. The paper has the following contributions: first, it shows that estimated parameters for adverse selection and moral hazard effects are sensitive to the model choice; second, the random effects panel data as well as standard pooled data models do not provide reliable estimates for health care demand (doctor visits); third, it shows that by appropriately accounting for zero inflation and over-dispersion there is no evidence of adverse selection behaviour and that moral hazard plays a positive and significant role for visiting more doctors. These results are robust for both males and females’ subsamples as well as for the full data sample
Lien HALAucune publication disponible pour le moment.
Aucune publication disponible pour le moment.